RESIDENT OF LANE NO. 1 LAKADMANDI JANIPUR TH VIR JI BINDROO AND OTHERS M TARIQ MUGHAL vs KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS — CCP(S) /119/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 15(1). Next hearing: 21st August 2026.

CNR: JKHC020017012025

Next Hearing

21st August 2026

Filing Number

CCP(S) /1258/2025

Filing Date

27-03-2025

Registration No

CCP(S) /119/2025

Registration Date

04-04-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

OWP. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT Section 15(1)

Petitioner(s)

RESIDENT OF LANE NO. 1 LAKADMANDI JANIPUR TH VIR JI BINDROO AND OTHERS M TARIQ MUGHAL

Respondent(s)

KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI

01-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

07-04-2025

FOR ORDERS Before Notice

21-08-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

27-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

01-04-2026

Revoked

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the petitioner's prayer to delete respondents 1, 2, 3, and 5 from the contempt petition, as the court directions were issued only to respondent 4 (Commissioner, Jammu Municipal Corporation). The contempt petition shall continue solely against the Commissioner, who has been granted two weeks to file a fresh compliance report. The case is listed for hearing on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the petitioner's prayer to delete respondents 1, 2, 3, and 5 from the contempt petition, as the court directions were issued only to respondent 4 (Commissioner, Jammu Municipal Corporation). The contempt petition shall continue solely against the Commissioner, who has been granted two weeks to file a fresh compliance report. The case is listed for hearing on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case