R.Dhanalakshmi and 3 Others vs D.Natarajan and 16 others Advocate - v.Egambaram — 100246/2008
Case under --- Section 37. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR080000472008
Filing Number
100246/2008
Filing Date
09-10-2008
Registration No
100246/2008
Registration Date
29-10-2008
Court
II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Dhanalakshmi and 3 Others
Adv. Girish Neelakandan
Respondent(s)
D.Natarajan and 16 others Advocate - v.Egambaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Judgement
Restored
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | Restored |
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
This document is a memorandum of valuation for a property dispute case, not a final court judgment. It contains only the valuation details and case information (O.S. No. 246/2008), listing parties and property schedules at Palerippattu village, Thiruvallur District. SKIP — The document lacks a substantive court decision. It is a procedural filing showing suit valuation (₹13,02,000 for plaintiff's 1/3 share, court fee ₹901/-) and property details, but contains no ruling on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
This document is a memorandum of valuation for a property dispute case, not a final court judgment. It contains only the valuation details and case information (O.S. No. 246/2008), listing parties and property schedules at Palerippattu village, Thiruvallur District. SKIP — The document lacks a substantive court decision. It is a procedural filing showing suit valuation (₹13,02,000 for plaintiff's 1/3 share, court fee ₹901/-) and property details, but contains no ruling on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts