Perumal.A vs The Panchayat President Advocate - Arulprakash.R Govern.Pleaddr. — 200044/2010

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section UnderOrderVIIRules1to6C.P.C.. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNSA080000202010

IA Pending

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200044/2010

Filing Date

11-02-2010

Registration No

200044/2010

Registration Date

11-02-2010

Court

District Munsif Court, Sankari

Judge

2-District Munsif, Sankari

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section UnderOrderVIIRules1to6C.P.C.
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section Us.27(c)T.N.C.F.Act

Petitioner(s)

Perumal.A

Adv. Kulandaivelu.R.

Saravanan

Adv. Arulprakash.R

Respondent(s)

The Panchayat President Advocate - Arulprakash.R Govern.Pleaddr.

The Block Development Officer

Adv. Arulprakash.R.Government Pleader.

The Thasilldar, Sankari

Adv. Arulprakash.R.Government Pleader.

The Revenue Divisional officdr

The District Collector, Salem.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari

16-04-2026

IA Pending

26-03-2026

IA Pending

12-03-2026

IA Pending

10-03-2026

IA Pending

02-03-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court allowed two interlocutory applications (I.A. 9/2025 and I.A. 10/2025) permitting consequential amendments to pending petitions following the death of plaintiff A. Perumal. The court held that the amendments were necessary to align the pleadings with updated party information and did not prejudice respondents. No costs were awarded in either application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sankari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case