KANNAN vs SHANTHA KUMAR — 22/2019

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25d 27c. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP070001342019

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

83/2019

Filing Date

08-04-2010

Registration No

22/2019

Registration Date

28-04-2010

Court

Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam

Judge

3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25d 27c

Petitioner(s)

KANNAN

Adv. SAMPATHKUMAR S P

Respondent(s)

SHANTHA KUMAR

PERUMAL

ASHOKAN

SAMPATH KUMAR

THE SUB REGISTRAR

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

VELU

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Subordinate Judge(LAOP),Arakkonam

23-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgement

11-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Decree/Decretal Order

Summary The Special Court for Land Disputes in Arakkonam (Tamil Nadu) decided in favor of the plaintiff Kannan in OS No. 22/2019, declaring his title to the disputed land (Survey Nos. 955/2 and 957/3, totaling 0.34 hectares at Wallajah Taluk, Vellore District). The court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants 3-5 from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. The case was dismissed against the 6th and 16th defendants with costs of Rs. 4,260 awarded to the 16th defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Court for Land Disputes in Arakkonam (Tamil Nadu) decided in favor of the plaintiff Kannan in OS No. 22/2019, declaring his title to the disputed land (Survey Nos. 955/2 and 957/3, totaling 0.34 hectares at Wallajah Taluk, Vellore District). The court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants 3-5 from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. The case was dismissed against the 6th and 16th defendants with costs of Rs. 4,260 awarded to the 16th defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Special Sub Court to deal with LAOP Cases, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case