R. Jeyakodi vs R. Jeyachandran — 93/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010043482020
Filing Number
2276/2020
Filing Date
22-Dec-2020
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
22-Mar-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R. Jeyakodi
Adv. M. Ramalingam
Respondent(s)
-
1.R. Jeyachandran
-
2.J.Sivagami
-
3.R.Muthulakshmi
-
4.M/s Indus Tower Ltd. through its Authorized Signatory, Chennai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
Summary The Principal District Judge, Dindigul dismissed the partition suit (OS No. 93/2021) filed by R. Jayakodi against three family members and Indus Tower Ltd. for default on March 25, 2026. The plaintiff sought partition of properties valued at Rs. 28,67,272/-, declaration that a gift deed was null and void, and permanent injunction, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff remained absent during hearing and failed to file the required affidavit evidence (PW1 proof). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Restored
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
03-Jan-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
03-Jan-2024
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
16-Nov-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
07-Sep-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Aug-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jul-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jul-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jun-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
28-Apr-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
30-Mar-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
21-Feb-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Feb-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2022
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
30-Nov-2022
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Nov-2022
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Nov-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jun-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Feb-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
27-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
25-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jun-2021
Await Notice
Principal District Judge
-
22-Apr-2021
Await Notice
Principal District Judge
-
22-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2021
Summary The Principal District Judge, Dindigul dismissed the partition suit (OS No. 93/2021) filed by R. Jayakodi against three family members and Indus Tower Ltd. for default on March 25, 2026. The plaintiff sought partition of properties valued at Rs. 28,67,272/-, declaration that a gift deed was null and void, and permanent injunction, but the suit was dismissed because the plaintiff remained absent during hearing and failed to file the required affidavit evidence (PW1 proof). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts