Gowriyammal vs R.Shanthamani Advocate - Viswanathan.R — 101/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 40,27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCB170001142020
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
114/2020
Filing Date
01-09-2020
Registration No
101/2020
Registration Date
09-09-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Sulur
Judge
30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gowriyammal
Adv. Karuppuswamy.S
Respondent(s)
R.Shanthamani Advocate - Viswanathan.R
A.Dhanabal
Adv. Viswanathan.R
The Sub-Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 30-DISTRICT MUNSIF, SULUR
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
The District Munsif Court of Sulur recorded the deposition of witness Tmt. A. Sathi on 03.02.2026 in Original Case No. 101/2020, wherein the witness affirmed the contents of her written examination-in-chief statement and confirmed the authenticity of her signature. The court adjourned the matter to mark and index the documents as evidence, with the witness testimony to be read back and acknowledged by her as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif Court of Sulur recorded the deposition of witness Tmt. A. Sathi on 03.02.2026 in Original Case No. 101/2020, wherein the witness affirmed the contents of her written examination-in-chief statement and confirmed the authenticity of her signature. The court adjourned the matter to mark and index the documents as evidence, with the witness testimony to be read back and acknowledged by her as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts