ram gopal suman vs adhishashi abhiyanta Advocate - Ramesh Chand Kabra — 56/2018

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 80. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 09th March 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: RJBR120001302018

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

123/2018

Filing Date

14-11-2018

Registration No

56/2018

Registration Date

14-11-2018

Court

CJ Anta Taluka

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 80

Petitioner(s)

ram gopal suman

Adv. Mukesh Kumar Suman

Respondent(s)

adhishashi abhiyanta Advocate - Ramesh Chand Kabra

atrikat shetriya vikas ayukat

ashishan abhiyanta

rajasthan sarkar

thasiladar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

09-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

05-02-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

15-01-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

23-12-2025

Plaintiff Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order

Summary The Civil Judge of Anta, Bara (Rajasthan) rejected the plaintiff's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejecting the defendant's written statement. The court found that the plaintiff's suit concerning irrigation rights to agricultural land in Nagda village falls outside the civil court's jurisdiction as it relates to water supply matters governed by the Rajasthan Irrigation Act 1954, Section 52, which restricts civil courts from issuing orders on crop irrigation. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition with directions that the file be returned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-08-2024
Order
17-09-2025
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge of Anta, Bara (Rajasthan) rejected the plaintiff's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejecting the defendant's written statement. The court found that the plaintiff's suit concerning irrigation rights to agricultural land in Nagda village falls outside the civil court's jurisdiction as it relates to water supply matters governed by the Rajasthan Irrigation Act 1954, Section 52, which restricts civil courts from issuing orders on crop irrigation. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition with directions that the file be returned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJ Anta Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case