Anusaya Raman Sankhe and others 1 vs Pragati Shital Sahkari Gruhnirman Sanstha Limited and others — 100/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHTH170030522025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-07-2025
Filing Number
233/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Divison , Palghar
Judge
6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anusaya Raman Sankhe and others 1
Adv. PAL RAMESH RAMDAVAR
Pranay Raman Sankhe
Adv. PAL RAMESH RAMDAVAR
Respondent(s)
Pragati Shital Sahkari Gruhnirman Sanstha Limited and others
Pragati Nirmal Sahkari Gruhnirman Sanstha Limited
Pragati Punam Sahkari Gruhnirman Sanstha Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 6-II JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J. D. J.M.F.C. PALGHAR
Hearing
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100/2025 The 2nd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Palghar, allowed the petitioners' application to amend their pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 16/03/2026. The court clarified that allowing amendment does not confirm the veracity of amended assertions; the plaintiff must still prove them at trial, and the defendant retains the right to raise defenses including jurisdictional objections. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100/2025 The 2nd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Palghar, allowed the petitioners' application to amend their pleadings under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 16/03/2026. The court clarified that allowing amendment does not confirm the veracity of amended assertions; the plaintiff must still prove them at trial, and the defendant retains the right to raise defenses including jurisdictional objections. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts