Ritika Harinath Rana vs None — 1688/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG040054772025

e-Filing Number

13-11-2025

Filing Number

4507/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

1688/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ritika Harinath Rana

    Adv. KADAM NANDINI PANKAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.None

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    I don't see any judgment text provided for Case 1688/2025. You've shared the case metadata (case number, petitioner name, and respondent information), but the actual judgment content that I need to summarize is missing. Please provide the judgment text for Case 1688/2025 (Ritika Harinath Rana), and I'll summarize the court's decision and key reasoning in 2-3 sentences under 600 characters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge S.D. Panvel

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1688/2025

casestatus.in Summary

I don't see any judgment text provided for Case 1688/2025. You've shared the case metadata (case number, petitioner name, and respondent information), but the actual judgment content that I need to summarize is missing. Please provide the judgment text for Case 1688/2025 (Ritika Harinath Rana), and I'll summarize the court's decision and key reasoning in 2-3 sentences under 600 characters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case