Shashikala Vithal Nigut vs Surekha Dharmraj Wagh Advocate - V.S. Bhoyar — 36/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG190001872025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
187/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2020
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2020
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shashikala Vithal Nigut
Adv. Advo. Khante
Pravin Vithal Nigut
Adv. D. A. Golhar
Swapnil Vithal Nigut
Respondent(s)
Surekha Dharmraj Wagh Advocate - V.S. Bhoyar
Dipak Vithal Nigut
Chanda Ani Choudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Special Divorce Case (Vishesh Vivahi Vada No. 36/2025) between Shashikala and Surekha decided by the Senior Civil Judge at Katol on 20.01.2026. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (Shashikala) regarding claims of marriage to Vithal Vigot, maintenance of his children, and property rights. The plaintiff admitted to filing false documents, false marriage certificate (Article 29), and fake identity proofs, and acknowledged having no legal claim to the disputed property or the defendants' maintenance. The court found the plaintiff's testimony highly contradictory and unreliable, ultimately rejecting her claims as unsubstantiated and dismissing the case with prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Special Divorce Case (Vishesh Vivahi Vada No. 36/2025) between Shashikala and Surekha decided by the Senior Civil Judge at Katol on 20.01.2026. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (Shashikala) regarding claims of marriage to Vithal Vigot, maintenance of his children, and property rights. The plaintiff admitted to filing false documents, false marriage certificate (Article 29), and fake identity proofs, and acknowledged having no legal claim to the disputed property or the defendants' maintenance. The court found the plaintiff's testimony highly contradictory and unreliable, ultimately rejecting her claims as unsubstantiated and dismissing the case with prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts