Shashikala Vithal Nigut vs Surekha Dharmraj Wagh Advocate - V.S. Bhoyar — 36/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHNG190001872025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

187/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2020

Registration No

36/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2020

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Shashikala Vithal Nigut

Adv. Advo. Khante

Pravin Vithal Nigut

Adv. D. A. Golhar

Swapnil Vithal Nigut

Respondent(s)

Surekha Dharmraj Wagh Advocate - V.S. Bhoyar

Dipak Vithal Nigut

Chanda Ani Choudhari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Katol

27-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

30-09-2025
Evidence
20-01-2026
Evidence

Summary This is a Special Divorce Case (Vishesh Vivahi Vada No. 36/2025) between Shashikala and Surekha decided by the Senior Civil Judge at Katol on 20.01.2026. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (Shashikala) regarding claims of marriage to Vithal Vigot, maintenance of his children, and property rights. The plaintiff admitted to filing false documents, false marriage certificate (Article 29), and fake identity proofs, and acknowledged having no legal claim to the disputed property or the defendants' maintenance. The court found the plaintiff's testimony highly contradictory and unreliable, ultimately rejecting her claims as unsubstantiated and dismissing the case with prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Special Divorce Case (Vishesh Vivahi Vada No. 36/2025) between Shashikala and Surekha decided by the Senior Civil Judge at Katol on 20.01.2026. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff (Shashikala) regarding claims of marriage to Vithal Vigot, maintenance of his children, and property rights. The plaintiff admitted to filing false documents, false marriage certificate (Article 29), and fake identity proofs, and acknowledged having no legal claim to the disputed property or the defendants' maintenance. The court found the plaintiff's testimony highly contradictory and unreliable, ultimately rejecting her claims as unsubstantiated and dismissing the case with prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Katol All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case