Ejaz Gaffar Patel vs M/s. S.K.S. Engineering (Formerly known M/s. Shraddha Engg.) Through its Mr. Arun Targe Advocate - DHABARDE BHUJANG KASHINATH — 20/2019
Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section 22. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Appln WCA C - C
CNR: MHLC200006522019
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
786/2019
Filing Date
24-07-2019
Registration No
20/2019
Registration Date
26-07-2019
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ejaz Gaffar Patel
Adv. KATKAR AVINASH BABARAO
Respondent(s)
M/s. S.K.S. Engineering (Formerly known M/s. Shraddha Engg.) Through its Mr. Arun Targe Advocate - DHABARDE BHUJANG KASHINATH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Evidence
Additional W.S.
Additional W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Additional W.S. |
| 04-02-2026 | Additional W.S. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court allowed the applicant's application for amendment of pleadings in this workman compensation case dated 21/01/2026. The amendment permits the applicant to add a second respondent firm and claim compensation and arrears against both proprietorship firms where he worked since January 2019, as the court found the amendment procedural and non-prejudicial to the respondents who have already filed written statements. The respondents are now at liberty to file additional written statements in response to the amended application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court allowed the applicant's application for amendment of pleadings in this workman compensation case dated 21/01/2026. The amendment permits the applicant to add a second respondent firm and claim compensation and arrears against both proprietorship firms where he worked since January 2019, as the court found the amendment procedural and non-prejudicial to the respondents who have already filed written statements. The respondents are now at liberty to file additional written statements in response to the amended application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts