Ramjan Dadu Shahanediwan vs Imran Moulali Shahanediwan Advocate - S. S. Kestikar — 174/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130022122025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-12-2025
Filing Number
298/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
174/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramjan Dadu Shahanediwan
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Respondent(s)
Imran Moulali Shahanediwan Advocate - S. S. Kestikar
Moulali Dadu Shahanediwan
Samsher Dadu Shahanediwan 4.
Mubarak Maqbul Shahanediwan 4.
Shabbir Maqbul Shahanediwan
Sarpanch /Grampanchayat officer,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Issues
Issues
Citation
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Issues | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 18-02-2026 | Citation | |
| 02-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 29-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge partially allowed plaintiff Ramjan Dadu Shahanediwan's application for temporary injunction filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's right of way to approach his house (Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 214) until final disposal of the suit. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's other prayers regarding restraining defendants from construction on Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 215 and preventing government scheme sanctions, finding that the defendants prima facie had rights over that property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge partially allowed plaintiff Ramjan Dadu Shahanediwan's application for temporary injunction filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's right of way to approach his house (Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 214) until final disposal of the suit. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's other prayers regarding restraining defendants from construction on Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 215 and preventing government scheme sanctions, finding that the defendants prima facie had rights over that property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts