Hasmukhbhai Naginbhai Shah vs Lata Vijay Tawarawala Advocate - JAKKALWAR G.M. — 57/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020013232019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1337/2019
Filing Date
17-07-2019
Registration No
57/2019
Registration Date
18-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hasmukhbhai Naginbhai Shah
Adv. RATHI S.G.
Vinodkumar Nagindas Shah
Respondent(s)
Lata Vijay Tawarawala Advocate - JAKKALWAR G.M.
Ashok Sadashiv Tawarawala
Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.
Uma Dilip Tawarawala
Adv. ATOLE M. B.
Nikhil Dilip Tawarawala
Adv. ATOLE M. B.
Mahesh Sadashiv Tawarawala
Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.
Lalita Badrinarayan Tawarawala
Adv. JAKKALWAR G.M.
Narayan Harichand Bhagat
Adv. POKHARKAR M.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.57/2019 Defendant No.7 filed an application objecting to the admission of sale-deed no.161/1976 (dated 07.02.1976) as evidence, arguing it was not a public document and that a prior consent decree from suit R.C.S.no.351/2011 was not binding on them. The Civil Judge rejected the application, holding that the sale-deed is an admissible certified copy of a public document per Supreme Court precedent. Application dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Spl.C.S.No.57/2019 Defendant No.7 filed an application objecting to the admission of sale-deed no.161/1976 (dated 07.02.1976) as evidence, arguing it was not a public document and that a prior consent decree from suit R.C.S.no.351/2011 was not binding on them. The Civil Judge rejected the application, holding that the sale-deed is an admissible certified copy of a public document per Supreme Court precedent. Application dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts