Shri. Madhav Vyankatesh Bhise vs Divisional Controller M. S. R. T. C. Thane Division Advocate - Smita H. Danke — 194/2022
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC040003202022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
368/2022
Filing Date
28-09-2022
Registration No
194/2022
Registration Date
28-09-2022
Court
Industrial Court,Thane
Judge
1-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Madhav Vyankatesh Bhise
Adv. U.S.Jagdale
Respondent(s)
Divisional Controller M. S. R. T. C. Thane Division Advocate - Smita H. Danke
M.S.R.T.C. Mumbai Through Divisional Controller Thane Division
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member
Cross
Order on Exh.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh. |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The Industrial Court at Thane found the inquiry conducted by MSRTC against complainant Shri. Madhav Vyankatesh Bhise to be unfair, improper, and violative of natural justice principles. The court also declared the inquiry officer's findings perverse and unsupported by material evidence, specifically noting the failure to examine key witnesses (Divisional Engineer and Depot Manager) who could have corroborated the complainant's defense regarding the engagement of private cleaners during the COVID-19 pandemic period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The Industrial Court at Thane found the inquiry conducted by MSRTC against complainant Shri. Madhav Vyankatesh Bhise to be unfair, improper, and violative of natural justice principles. The court also declared the inquiry officer's findings perverse and unsupported by material evidence, specifically noting the failure to examine key witnesses (Divisional Engineer and Depot Manager) who could have corroborated the complainant's defense regarding the engagement of private cleaners during the COVID-19 pandemic period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts