State of Kerala Police vs PRAMOD Advocate - AJAY V A, Gokul K G, Gokul K GChristy Thomas, — 1220/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),103(1). Status: Call with MP. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR110027692025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
3913/2025
Filing Date
09-04-2025
Registration No
1220/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
MALA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Respondent(s)
PRAMOD Advocate - AJAY V A, Gokul K G, Gokul K GChristy Thomas,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Call with MP
Issue production warrant
Issue Bailable Warrant
Await report
Report from FSL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Call with MP |
| 21-05-2026 | Issue production warrant |
| 02-05-2026 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
| 20-04-2026 | Await report |
| 18-04-2026 | Report from FSL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SC.1220/2025 Pramod (age 31) sought interim bail for 15 days, citing 14 months in judicial custody and family dependents. However, the Additional Sessions Judge dismissed his bail application, finding the gravity of accusations serious (alleged murder on 13/01/2025 using sword and other weapons), combined with his 34 criminal cases, rowdy list inclusion, three prior preventive detentions under KAAPA, and proximity to witnesses as neighbors—creating significant risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC.1220/2025 Pramod (age 31) sought interim bail for 15 days, citing 14 months in judicial custody and family dependents. However, the Additional Sessions Judge dismissed his bail application, finding the gravity of accusations serious (alleged murder on 13/01/2025 using sword and other weapons), combined with his 34 criminal cases, rowdy list inclusion, three prior preventive detentions under KAAPA, and proximity to witnesses as neighbors—creating significant risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts