CBCID vs NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI — 900093/2019

Case under Ipc \ Section 120(B),406,420 R/W 34. Status: Issue Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR090003782019

Issue Summons

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

Filing Number

900093/2019

Filing Date

26-08-2019

Registration No

900093/2019

Registration Date

26-08-2019

Court

ACJM, Thrissur

Judge

1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

547

Police Station

TOWN WEST,THRISSUR

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

IPC \ Section 120(B),406,420 R/W 34
Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978\ Section 4,5,6
Crl.MP/5440/2025 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCID
Crl.MP/6440/2025 Classification : Urgent Application Section CBCID
Crl.MP/6441/2025 Classification : Sanction Petition Section CBCID
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCID
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCIDSAJEEV K @SAJEEV KARUN
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section CBCIDJAYAN P G
Crl.MP/4/2026 Classification : Petition Section CBCIDJAYAN P G
Crl.MP/5/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section CBCIDBIJESH
Crl.MP/6/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section CBCIDJAYAN P G
Crl.MP/7/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCIDJAYAN P G
Crl.MP/8/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCIDBIJESH
Crl.MP/9/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section CBCIDC D TISSARANT
Crl.MP/10/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Extension Of Time Section CBCIDC D TISSARANT
Crl.MP/11/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section CBCIDC D TISSARANT

Petitioner(s)

CBCID

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI

NANO EXCEL CORPORATION ltd rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI

NANO POWER CORPORATION Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI

HARRISH BABU MADINENNI

CHINNA RAO SWAYAMVARAPPU

PATRIC THOMAS

P P RENGA REDDY

MEERA HARRISH K

RADHA SUNDHARA RAJAH

PRASANTH SUNDHAR RAJA

KUMARI RAJAH

SARATH BABU LAGADAPATI

CHEDELLA SUBASHINI

MUHAMMED ASHARAF

Adv. ADV NAVEESH

P D LONAPPAN

C D TISSARANT

PRAMOD KUMAR

JAYAN P G

Adv. PRAMOD K

SHABEER

Adv. ADV NAVEESH

BIJESH

Adv. PRAMOD K

ANILKUMAR

Adv. ADV NAVEESH

SAJEEV K @SAJEEV KARUN

Adv. PRAMOD K

SAJEEV RAJAN

Adv. ADV NAVEESH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate

19-05-2026

Issue Summons

20-04-2026

Issue Summons

25-03-2026

Call on

19-03-2026

Appearance of Accused

17-03-2026

Oders in CMP

Interim Orders

27-09-2025
Order
27-09-2025
Order
27-09-2025
Order
27-09-2025
Order
27-09-2025
Order
19-03-2026
Interim Order

Case Summary: CMP 4/2026 in CC 93/2019 The petition filed by Jayan (Accused No. 18) under Section 22(a) of the Passports Act, 1967 seeking permission to obtain a passport was partly allowed. The accused is facing charges in a money circulation scheme case involving 23 accused persons. The court permitted him to depart India for one year to attend a Vietnam Business Delegation, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, filing affidavits regarding identity and court representation, and appointing a local relative for service of notices. However, the request to dispense with personal appearance for three years was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP 4/2026 in CC 93/2019 The petition filed by Jayan (Accused No. 18) under Section 22(a) of the Passports Act, 1967 seeking permission to obtain a passport was partly allowed. The accused is facing charges in a money circulation scheme case involving 23 accused persons. The court permitted him to depart India for one year to attend a Vietnam Business Delegation, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, filing affidavits regarding identity and court representation, and appointing a local relative for service of notices. However, the request to dispense with personal appearance for three years was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ACJM, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case