CBCID vs NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI — 900093/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120(B),406,420 R/W 34. Status: Issue Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR090003782019
Filing Number
900093/2019
Filing Date
26-Aug-2019
Registration No
900093/2019
Registration Date
26-Aug-2019
Court
ACJM, Thrissur
Judge
1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
547
Police Station
TOWN WEST,THRISSUR
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CBCID
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI
-
2.NANO EXCEL CORPORATION ltd rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI
-
3.NANO POWER CORPORATION Ltd Rep by HARRISH BABU MADINENNI
-
4.HARRISH BABU MADINENNI
-
5.CHINNA RAO SWAYAMVARAPPU
-
6.PATRIC THOMAS
-
7.P P RENGA REDDY
-
8.MEERA HARRISH K
-
9.RADHA SUNDHARA RAJAH
-
10.PRASANTH SUNDHAR RAJA
-
11.KUMARI RAJAH
-
12.SARATH BABU LAGADAPATI
-
13.CHEDELLA SUBASHINI
-
14.MUHAMMED ASHARAF
Adv. ADV NAVEESH
-
15.P D LONAPPAN
-
16.C D TISSARANT
-
17.PRAMOD KUMAR
-
18.JAYAN P G
Adv. PRAMOD K
-
19.SHABEER
Adv. ADV NAVEESH
-
20.BIJESH
Adv. PRAMOD K
-
21.ANILKUMAR
Adv. ADV NAVEESH
-
22.SAJEEV K @SAJEEV KARUN
Adv. PRAMOD K
-
23.SAJEEV RAJAN
Adv. ADV NAVEESH
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Issue Summons
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Issue Summons
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2026
Interim OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CMP 4/2026 in CC 93/2019 The petition filed by Jayan (Accused No. 18) under Section 22(a) of the Passports Act, 1967 seeking permission to obtain a passport was partly allowed. The accused is facing charges in a money circulation scheme case involving 23 accused persons. The court permitted him to depart India for one year to attend a Vietnam Business Delegation, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, filing affidavits regarding identity and court representation, and appointing a local relative for service of notices. However, the request to dispense with personal appearance for three years was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Appearance of Accused
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2026
Directed To Deliver the Property
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2025
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Issue NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
Issue NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2025
Remand Extended
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2025
Issue production warrant
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
For hearing in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2025
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2025
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2025
repeat NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2025
Hearing on Charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2025
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2024
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2024
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2024
Call with Mp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2024
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Feb-2024
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2023
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2023
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2023
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2023
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2023
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2023
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Feb-2023
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2022
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2022
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2022
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2022
For reports
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2022
For Hearing
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2022
For Hearing
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2022
For Hearing
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jan-2022
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2021
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2021
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2020
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2020
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2020
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2020
Remand Extended
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2020
Remand Extended
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jan-2020
Accused produced ,remanded
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 900093/2019
Case Summary: CMP 4/2026 in CC 93/2019 The petition filed by Jayan (Accused No. 18) under Section 22(a) of the Passports Act, 1967 seeking permission to obtain a passport was partly allowed. The accused is facing charges in a money circulation scheme case involving 23 accused persons. The court permitted him to depart India for one year to attend a Vietnam Business Delegation, subject to executing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, filing affidavits regarding identity and court representation, and appointing a local relative for service of notices. However, the request to dispense with personal appearance for three years was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts