State of Kerala (Police) vs Nano Excel Corporation Ltd represented by Harish Babu Madineni — 900088/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120(b),406,420,34. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR090000632016
Filing Number
900088/2016
Filing Date
21-Sep-2023
Registration No
900088/2016
Registration Date
21-Sep-2023
Court
ACJM, Thrissur
Judge
1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst Public Prosecutor(ACJM,Thrissur)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nano Excel Corporation Ltd represented by Harish Babu Madineni
-
2.Harish Babu Madhineni
-
3.Patric Thomas
-
4.Chinna Rao Swayamvarapu
-
5.Radha Sundhara Raja
-
6.Prasanth Sundhar Rajah
-
7.P P Ranga Reddy
-
8.Meera Harish.K
-
9.Lagadapathy Sarath Babu@ Sarath
-
10.P D Lonappan
-
11.C.D.Tisserent
-
12.P.P.Francis
-
13.S.Swaminathan
-
14.Benny Thomas
-
15.C.M .Surendran Nair
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
for evidence.
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
Issue Summons
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
repeat NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2026
Adjourned
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
for evidence.
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2026
Call on
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Issue Summons
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
82-83 Steps
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Interim OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Radha Sundara Rajah's Discharge Petition (Case 900088/2016) Outcome: The discharge petition filed by accused no. 5, Radha Sundara Rajah, under Section 239 CrPC was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, on November 7, 2025. Key Finding: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner for offences under IPC sections 120B, 406, 420 r/w 34 and sections 5-6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The petitioner's claim of being merely a shareholder was rejected; evidence showed she was authorized to operate the company's bank account, indicating active involvement in the money circulation scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2025
repeat NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Issue NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2025
Issue Bailable Warrant
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2025
Issue production warrant
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2025
No sitting notified
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
Oders in Cmp
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2025
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2025
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2024
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
Issue NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2024
Issue NBW
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
Issue Bailable Warrant
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2024
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2024
For framing charge
Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 900088/2016
Case Summary: Radha Sundara Rajah's Discharge Petition (Case 900088/2016) Outcome: The discharge petition filed by accused no. 5, Radha Sundara Rajah, under Section 239 CrPC was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, on November 7, 2025. Key Finding: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner for offences under IPC sections 120B, 406, 420 r/w 34 and sections 5-6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The petitioner's claim of being merely a shareholder was rejected; evidence showed she was authorized to operate the company's bank account, indicating active involvement in the money circulation scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts