State of Kerala (Police) vs Nano Excel Corporation Ltd represented by Harish Babu Madineni — 900088/2016
Case under Ipc \ Section 120(b),406,420,34. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR090000632016
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
900088/2016
Filing Date
21-09-2023
Registration No
900088/2016
Registration Date
21-09-2023
Court
ACJM, Thrissur
Judge
1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst Public Prosecutor(ACJM,Thrissur)
Respondent(s)
Nano Excel Corporation Ltd represented by Harish Babu Madineni
Harish Babu Madhineni
Patric Thomas
Chinna Rao Swayamvarapu
Radha Sundhara Raja
Prasanth Sundhar Rajah
P P Ranga Reddy
Meera Harish.K
Lagadapathy Sarath Babu@ Sarath
P D Lonappan
C.D.Tisserent
P.P.Francis
S.Swaminathan
Benny Thomas
C.M .Surendran Nair
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
for evidence.
Issue Summons
No sitting notified
repeat NBW
Adjourned
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | for evidence. |
| 18-05-2026 | Issue Summons |
| 16-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 25-02-2026 | repeat NBW |
| 21-02-2026 | Adjourned |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Radha Sundara Rajah's Discharge Petition (Case 900088/2016) Outcome: The discharge petition filed by accused no. 5, Radha Sundara Rajah, under Section 239 CrPC was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, on November 7, 2025. Key Finding: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner for offences under IPC sections 120B, 406, 420 r/w 34 and sections 5-6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The petitioner's claim of being merely a shareholder was rejected; evidence showed she was authorized to operate the company's bank account, indicating active involvement in the money circulation scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Radha Sundara Rajah's Discharge Petition (Case 900088/2016) Outcome: The discharge petition filed by accused no. 5, Radha Sundara Rajah, under Section 239 CrPC was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, on November 7, 2025. Key Finding: The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner for offences under IPC sections 120B, 406, 420 r/w 34 and sections 5-6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The petitioner's claim of being merely a shareholder was rejected; evidence showed she was authorized to operate the company's bank account, indicating active involvement in the money circulation scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts