HUDCO vs Mathew T.J Advocate - ASHIQ MUHAMMAD S, Muhammed Ameer.J — 100012/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: For Payment. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLKM270002072017
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
100153/2017
Filing Date
12-04-2017
Registration No
100012/2017
Registration Date
12-04-2017
Court
Sub Court Karunagappally
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HUDCO
Adv. Somasekharan Pillai K., SAJEEB S
Respondent(s)
Mathew T.J Advocate - ASHIQ MUHAMMAD S, Muhammed Ameer.J
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
For Payment
Sale
Settlement of proclamation
For hearing EA
Settlement of proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | For Payment |
| 31-03-2026 | Sale |
| 13-03-2026 | Settlement of proclamation |
| 04-03-2026 | For hearing EA |
| 24-02-2026 | Settlement of proclamation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100012/2017 HUDCO's execution petition (EA.01/26) to release ₹2,00,000/- deposited by judgment debtor T.J. Mathew was dismissed. The court held that since the underlying High Court case (OP(C) 2482/2025) remains pending and the deposit was made as a condition for interim stay ordered by the High Court, releasing the amount requires High Court's sanction and judicial decorum. The decree holder may proceed with fresh sale steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100012/2017 HUDCO's execution petition (EA.01/26) to release ₹2,00,000/- deposited by judgment debtor T.J. Mathew was dismissed. The court held that since the underlying High Court case (OP(C) 2482/2025) remains pending and the deposit was made as a condition for interim stay ordered by the High Court, releasing the amount requires High Court's sanction and judicial decorum. The decree holder may proceed with fresh sale steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts