JAMEELA BI vs ZAIBUNNISA — 30/2015

Case under U/o 7 Rule of 1 C.p.c. Section --. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS400001792015

JUDGMENTS

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

30/2015

Filing Date

16-07-2015

Registration No

30/2015

Registration Date

20-07-2015

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA

Judge

922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

Acts & Sections

U/O 7 RULE OF 1 C.P.C. Section --

Petitioner(s)

JAMEELA BI

Adv. ABUBACKER SHAFI

MOHAMMED AFZAL AHAMED

NAZEERUNNISA

KHAMRUNNISA

MUJUBUNNISA

RABIA BEGUM

Respondent(s)

ZAIBUNNISA

ASIF UMMER

SYED MANSOOR

SIDDIQ AHAMED

SIDDIQ AHAMED KHAN

FAIZ AHMED KHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 922-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KRISHNARAJANAGAR

24-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

07-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

11-02-2026

JUDGMENTS

02-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

05-01-2026

JUDGMENTS

Interim Orders

24-03-2016
Orders
07-01-2020
Orders
22-09-2021
Deposition
29-09-2021
Deposition
19-11-2021
Deposition
10-03-2022
Deposition
25-05-2022
Deposition
05-07-2022
Deposition
27-07-2022
Deposition
16-08-2022
Deposition
26-09-2022
Deposition
31-10-2022
Deposition
08-03-2021
Issue
18-07-2023
Orders
27-01-2025
Deposition
17-04-2025
Deposition
16-12-2025
Orders

Summary The Court rejected the plaintiff's application (IA No.XXX) filed under Order 16 Rule 6 of CPC seeking summons to the register of marriage of Jamia Masjid and direction to produce a copy of the Nikanama (marriage certificate). The court found that the defendant's marriage status was not disputed and existing documents were sufficient to adjudicate the property ownership dispute; therefore, the Nikanama was unnecessary. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court rejected the plaintiff's application (IA No.XXX) filed under Order 16 Rule 6 of CPC seeking summons to the register of marriage of Jamia Masjid and direction to produce a copy of the Nikanama (marriage certificate). The court found that the defendant's marriage status was not disputed and existing documents were sufficient to adjudicate the property ownership dispute; therefore, the Nikanama was unnecessary. The application was dismissed with costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJANAGARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case