M/S SMRUTHI GOWDA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs GOWDA HOSAKEREMURUDESHWAR Advocate - B.S.NATARAJA — 1172/2025
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: NULL. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170027102025
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
1173/2025
Filing Date
23-08-2025
Registration No
1172/2025
Registration Date
23-08-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S SMRUTHI GOWDA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
Adv. LOKESH M K
Respondent(s)
GOWDA HOSAKEREMURUDESHWAR Advocate - B.S.NATARAJA
APOORVA G
Hearing History
Judge: 1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
NULL
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | NULL |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript in Commercial Suit No. 1172/2025 before the LXXXV Additional City Civil Judge in Bengaluru dated 17.02.2026. The witness (DW.1), a defendant in a construction contract dispute, was examined and cross-examined regarding allegations of defective construction work, payment disputes, and premature termination of the construction agreement. The witness denied various allegations concerning quality defects, disputed extra charges, and claimed prior payments for additional work. The case involves disputes over construction materials, sump placement, sand quality, foundation work, and architectural design fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript in Commercial Suit No. 1172/2025 before the LXXXV Additional City Civil Judge in Bengaluru dated 17.02.2026. The witness (DW.1), a defendant in a construction contract dispute, was examined and cross-examined regarding allegations of defective construction work, payment disputes, and premature termination of the construction agreement. The witness denied various allegations concerning quality defects, disputed extra charges, and claimed prior payments for additional work. The case involves disputes over construction materials, sump placement, sand quality, foundation work, and architectural design fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts