HEIRS OF BHOJABHAI AANADBHAI DHARANGA JASUBEN @ KADVIBEN BHOJABHAI DHRANGA vs LADUBEN D/O. NARANBHAI DANGAR Advocate - J.H.DHAMANI — 7/2018
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 006,008. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN100002922018
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
7/2018
Filing Date
19-04-2018
Registration No
7/2018
Registration Date
19-04-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF BHOJABHAI AANADBHAI DHARANGA JASUBEN @ KADVIBEN BHOJABHAI DHRANGA
Adv. S.D.CHAGLANI
RAMIBEN BHOJABHAI DHRANGA
HEIRS OF JIVUBEN BHOJABHAI DHRANGA KANABHAI DANABHAI HUMBAL
HEIRS OF ARJANBHAI DANABHAI HUMBAL HANSABEN ARAJANBHAI HUMBAL
RAJUBAHI ARJANBHAI HUMBAL
BHARTIBEN ARJANBHAI HUMBAL
RUPIBEN @ RUPALBEN ARJANBHAI HUMBAL
RUDABHAI DANABHAI HUMBAL
VAJIBEN DANABHAI HUMBAL
HEIRS OF AMARBEN DANABHAI HUMBAL W/O. DEVDANBHAI BHIMABHAI CHAVDA SHANTIBEN DEVDANBHAI CHAVDA
NITABEN DEVDANBHAI CHAVDA
KIRANBEN DEVDANBHAI CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
LADUBEN D/O. NARANBHAI DANGAR Advocate - J.H.DHAMANI
BABUBHAI SIDIBHAI HUMBAL
Adv. J.H.DHAMANI
HEIRS OF RATANBEN BHOJABHAI DHRANGA W/O. MEPABHAI KHANGAR HUMBAL KANABHAI MEPABHAI HUMBAL
Adv. J.H.DHAMANI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 21-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 7/2018 SKIP The document is primarily in Gujarati script with extensive legal citations and procedural discussions that are difficult to parse accurately into a coherent English summary within 600 characters. While portions are readable, the core judgment order and final outcome determination cannot be reliably extracted due to the document's language and formatting complexity. A proper summary would require fluent Gujarati legal document analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 7/2018 SKIP The document is primarily in Gujarati script with extensive legal citations and procedural discussions that are difficult to parse accurately into a coherent English summary within 600 characters. While portions are readable, the core judgment order and final outcome determination cannot be reliably extracted due to the document's language and formatting complexity. A proper summary would require fluent Gujarati legal document analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts