MANJIBHAI JAMNADAS SAVANI vs BHAGVANBHAI KALUBHAI SAVANI Advocate - S S DODIYA — 109/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBN090007052021

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

109/2021

Filing Date

20-05-2021

Registration No

109/2021

Registration Date

20-05-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMRALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 151

Petitioner(s)

MANJIBHAI JAMNADAS SAVANI

Adv. P L SONPAL, B P PARMAR

Respondent(s)

BHAGVANBHAI KALUBHAI SAVANI Advocate - S S DODIYA

KANJIBHAI KALUBHAI SAVANI

Adv. M V SOJITRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

05-05-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

21-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

15-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

06-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

30-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

02-07-2021
ORDER
26-09-2025
ORDER
26-09-2025
ORDER

CASE SUMMARY: RCS/109/2021 Petitioner: Manjibhai Jamnadas Savani Respondents: Bhagvanbhai Kalubhai Savani (Respondent 1) and Kanjibhai Kalubhai Savani (Respondent 2) Order: Petition DISMISSED The petitioner sought a mandatory injunction restraining respondents from using a specific agricultural path through his property in Umrala village. The Principal Civil Judge dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief. The court noted that prior court orders dated December 31, 1960, had already granted respondents the right to use the path for agricultural access, and the petitioner had not challenged those orders within the statutory period. Consequently, the petitioner lacked legal standing to prevent such established rights of way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: RCS/109/2021 Petitioner: Manjibhai Jamnadas Savani Respondents: Bhagvanbhai Kalubhai Savani (Respondent 1) and Kanjibhai Kalubhai Savani (Respondent 2) Order: Petition DISMISSED The petitioner sought a mandatory injunction restraining respondents from using a specific agricultural path through his property in Umrala village. The Principal Civil Judge dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief. The court noted that prior court orders dated December 31, 1960, had already granted respondents the right to use the path for agricultural access, and the petitioner had not challenged those orders within the statutory period. Consequently, the petitioner lacked legal standing to prevent such established rights of way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UMRALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case