Harihara Ravi Iyer vs THE STATE — 764/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 21st May 2026.
Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: DLND010105982023
e-Filing Number
12-12-2023
Filing Number
4032/2023
Filing Date
12-12-2023
Registration No
764/2023
Registration Date
14-12-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1791
Police Station
Tilak Marg
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harihara Ravi Iyer
Adv. Nikhil Kapoor
Respondent(s)
THE STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-05-2026 | Order |
| 11-05-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 28-01-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Harihara Ravi Iyer's revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application for FIR registration in a forged Board Resolution case against multiple respondents. The court held that since all evidence supporting the forgery allegations was already in the petitioner's possession, police investigation was unnecessary and the petitioner could prove the allegations through pre-summoning evidence without requiring custodial interrogation of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Harihara Ravi Iyer's revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application for FIR registration in a forged Board Resolution case against multiple respondents. The court held that since all evidence supporting the forgery allegations was already in the petitioner's possession, police investigation was unnecessary and the petitioner could prove the allegations through pre-summoning evidence without requiring custodial interrogation of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts