AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE, NAGPUR THR. DEPUTY SECRETARY (INCHARGE) PRASHANT D. NERKA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TOWN PLANNING, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/3825/2017

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226&227. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040281492016

Filing Number

WP/21740/2016

Filing Date

18-Oct-2016

Registration No

WP/3825/2017

Registration Date

21-Jun-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Category

APPOINTMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES ( 3 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226&227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE, NAGPUR THR. DEPUTY SECRETARY (INCHARGE) PRASHANT D. NERKA

    Adv. Advocate- ,VANDAN M. GADKARI,AKASH P. JOSHI,NIRAJ R. TIKNAYAT,(FOR PETITIONER)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TOWN PLANNING, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN,RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE,PALASH K. MOHTA,HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN,FOR/R-4 TO 7,PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN,PALASH K. MOHTA,HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN,FOR/R-3 & 8 TO 11 1123

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION (GENERAL) NAGPUR

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  3. 3.SAU. ANUSAYABAI W/O GULABRAO SAKHARKAR

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  4. 4.SHRI RUPRAO PANDURANG SAKORE

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  5. 5.SHRI. MAROTI S/O PANDURANG SAKORE

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  6. 6.SMT. PUSHA BHAURAO BALPANDE

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  7. 7.SMT. SARUBAI PANDURANG SAKORE

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  8. 8.SMT. KUSUMBAI SHYAMRAOJI GAYDHANE

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  9. 9.SMT. DEVKI DILIP YENURKAR THR. P.O.A. SHRI SANJAY GULABRAO SAKHARKAR

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  10. 10.SMT. SHOBHA VIJAY WAGHMARE THR. P.O.A. SHRI SANJAY GULABRAO SAKHARKAR

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO

  11. 11.SMT. KAUSHALYABAI BABURAO PADOLE THR. P.O.A. SHRI SANJAY GULABRAO SAKHARKAR

    Adv. PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN RAHUL S. KALANGIWALE PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-4 TO 7 PRUTHVIRAJ SHYAM CHAWHAN PALASH K. MOHTA HARSHWARDHAN CHAWHAN FOR/R-3 & 8 TO 11

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WP/3825/2017 The Bombay High Court dismissed the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Nagpur's petition challenging a land acquisition award. The core issue was whether compensation should be determined under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act or the 1894 Act. Since no award was passed before January 1, 2014 (when the 2013 Act commenced), Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act mandatorily applied, making the compensation determination under the newer, more favorable law legally correct. The petition was dismissed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    For Further Consideration

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    For Further Consideration

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    For Orders-Prioritised Cases/Old Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

  12. 15-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay JoshiView PDF

  13. 15-Jan-2019

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande , Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi

  14. 15-Jan-2019

    Ready Matter

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande , Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi

  15. 12-Dec-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,hon'ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak

  16. 12-Dec-2018

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak

  17. 05-Dec-2018

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak

  18. 24-Aug-2018

    Registrar(judicial)

  19. 13-Jul-2018

    Registrar(judicial)

  20. 13-Jul-2018

    For Orders -

    Registrar(judicial)

  21. 08-Jun-2018

    Registrar(judicial)

  22. 08-Jun-2018

    For Orders -

    Registrar(judicial)

  23. 05-Sep-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye

  24. 05-Sep-2017

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye

  25. 04-Aug-2017

    Registrar(judicial)

  26. 04-Aug-2017

    For Orders -

    Registrar(judicial)

  27. 11-Jul-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo

  28. 11-Jul-2017

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo

  29. 22-Jun-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo

  30. 22-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 18-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3825/2017

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP/3825/2017 The Bombay High Court dismissed the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Nagpur's petition challenging a land acquisition award. The core issue was whether compensation should be determined under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act or the 1894 Act. Since no award was passed before January 1, 2014 (when the 2013 Act commenced), Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act mandatorily applied, making the compensation determination under the newer, more favorable law legally correct. The petition was dismissed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case