SAH AND SANGHI vs DHRUNAL CHHOTALAL PATEL AND 4 ORS — IA/331/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 19th January 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020010852026

Filing Number

IA/1085/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

IA/331/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAH AND SANGHI

    Adv. Nainesh N Amin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHRUNAL CHHOTALAL PATEL AND 4 ORS

  2. 2.ADITYA DHRUNAL PATEL

  3. 3.MEENA VIJAY SHAH

  4. 4.VIJAY SHAH

  5. 5.KHUSHNUMA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court, in Suit No. 29 of 2025 between Khushnuma Cooperative Housing Society Limited and Dhrunal Chhotalal Patel, adjourned the case to 01/04/2026 for settlement or filing of consent terms. The court did not issue a substantive decision on the merits but instead directed the parties to pursue settlement negotiations, indicating the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/331/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court, in Suit No. 29 of 2025 between Khushnuma Cooperative Housing Society Limited and Dhrunal Chhotalal Patel, adjourned the case to 01/04/2026 for settlement or filing of consent terms. The court did not issue a substantive decision on the merits but instead directed the parties to pursue settlement negotiations, indicating the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case