M/S. BHAKTI DEVELOPERS, THROUGH PARTNER, SHRI. SHAMJI BHAVAN AARETHIYA vs SHRI. VIJAY GAIKWAD Advocate - Vinod Uttam Shinde, R.NO. 13 TO 18,Idris M Vohra — WP/2417/2014

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010526692013

Filing Number

WP/35875/2013

Filing Date

24-Dec-2013

Registration No

WP/2417/2014

Registration Date

04-Mar-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. BHAKTI DEVELOPERS, THROUGH PARTNER, SHRI. SHAMJI BHAVAN AARETHIYA

    Adv. DRUPAD SOPAN PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. VIJAY GAIKWAD Advocate - Vinod Uttam Shinde, R.NO. 13 TO 18,Idris M Vohra

  2. 2.SMT. SUSHILA YASHWANT PATOLE

  3. 3.SMT. CHANDA PUNDLIK JADHAV

  4. 4.SMT. VIMAL BHASKAR HARIYAN

  5. 5.SHRI BHARAT MARUTI GAIKWAD

  6. 6.SMT. JAYASHRI SUBODH CHANDANE

  7. 7.SMT. VATSALA MARUTI GAIKWAD

  8. 8.SHRI RAM MARUTI GAIKWAD

  9. 9.SMT. SUBHADRA DATTARAM GAIKWAD

  10. 10.SHRI SHASHIKANT DATTARAM GAIKWAD

  11. 11.SHRI MAHENDRA DATTARAM GAIKWAD

  12. 12.SHRI SHEKHAR DATTARAM GAIKWAD

  13. 13.PRAKASH KANU HUDDAR

  14. 14.RAMCHANDRA DHARMA HUDDAR

  15. 15.LAXMAN DHARMA HUDDAR

  16. 16.NAMDEV DHARMA HUDDAR

  17. 17.TULSHIRAM DHARMA HUDDAR

  18. 18.KALIBAI POTE

  19. 19.THE CITY and IND.DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAH.LTD.(CIDCO),THRO.THE REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICER

  20. 20.ACQUISITION OFFICER, METRO CENTRE NO.3, PANVEL, RAIGAD

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition and directed an inquiry into why Civil Suit No. 274 of 2007 was marked as "stayed" in court records since December 16, 2022, despite no stay order being granted by the High Court. The court reprimanded the Civil Judge at Panvel for casually filing a report based on clerk's information without verifying the original records herself, and ordered the Principal District Judge, Alibag, to investigate the discrepancy. The petition is adjourned to May 6, 2026, with a two-week deadline to serve unserved respondents, failing which the petition will be dismissed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  8. 06-Feb-2025

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 28-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 01-Sep-2023

    Admission (Old)

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  11. 17-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  12. 12-Jan-2023

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Sa Menezes

  13. 20-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Sa MenezesView PDF

  14. 23-Sep-2020

    Due For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari

  15. 14-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF

  16. 14-Jan-2019

    Due For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik

  17. 18-Oct-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF

  18. 18-Oct-2016

    For Admission - After Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar

  19. 10-Jun-2016

    For Admission - After Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  20. 29-Sep-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  21. 28-Sep-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  22. 16-Sep-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak

  23. 07-Sep-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  24. 28-Aug-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  25. 24-Jul-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar

  26. 26-Jun-2015

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar

  27. 05-May-2015

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF

  28. 05-May-2015

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak

  29. 21-Apr-2015

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak

  30. 18-Mar-2015

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak

  31. 21-Jan-2015

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  32. 25-Nov-2014

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  33. 30-Sep-2014

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  34. 25-Aug-2014

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.

  35. 02-May-2014

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  36. 04-Apr-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 24-Dec-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2417/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition and directed an inquiry into why Civil Suit No. 274 of 2007 was marked as "stayed" in court records since December 16, 2022, despite no stay order being granted by the High Court. The court reprimanded the Civil Judge at Panvel for casually filing a report based on clerk's information without verifying the original records herself, and ordered the Principal District Judge, Alibag, to investigate the discrepancy. The petition is adjourned to May 6, 2026, with a two-week deadline to serve unserved respondents, failing which the petition will be dismissed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case