SHRI BALAJI INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BALAJI INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED) vs STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED IISCO STEEL PLANT — C.A. No. 6873/2026

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010098152026

Filing Date

14-Feb-2026

Registration No

C.A. No. 6873/2026

Diary Number

9815/2026

Order Date

22-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to arbitral award, matters relating to execution under Section 36, under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenges to arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI BALAJI INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BALAJI INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED)

    Adv. AKANKSHA MEHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED IISCO STEEL PLANT

    Adv. NEELAM SHARMA [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6873/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court allowed Balaji Industrial Engineering's appeal against the High Court's Division Bench order. The court quashed the Division Bench's decision that had set aside a Single Judge's judgment on jurisdictional grounds, holding that the Single Judge was properly designated as a Commercial Court and thus had jurisdiction to decide the case. The matter has been remitted to the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court to hear and decide the Section 37 arbitration appeal on merits, with all contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case