STATE OF U.P. TH. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY vs PRAHLAD PURI — C.A. No. 9673/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010096142008
Filing Date
03-Apr-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 9673/2010
Diary Number
9614/2008
Order Date
28-Mar-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. TH. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1] TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-2]
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAHLAD PURI
Adv. S. JANANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
01-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9673/2010
Summary: C.A. No. 009673/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed Uttar Pradesh's appeal against the High Court's order that granted respondent Prahlad Puri seniority as Naib Tehsildar from 1990 (when he was ad-hoc appointed) and enhanced his pension accordingly. The Court found no reason to interfere, noting Puri had already retired in 2005 and no other officer would be adversely affected by the benefit granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts