RAMANDEEP SHARMA (DEAD) vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIAL TRAINING PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — C.A. No. 7169/2010
Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010094122009
Filing Date
28-Mar-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 7169/2010
Diary Number
9412/2009
Order Date
09-Aug-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMANDEEP SHARMA (DEAD)
Adv. DEVASHISH BHARUKA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-3] DEVASHISH BHARUKA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-2]
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIAL TRAINING PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] TUSHAR BAKSHI[R-3] TUSHAR BAKSHI[R-4] G. N. REDDY[R-5] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-6] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-7] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-8] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-9] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-10] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-12] NUPUR KUMAR[R-1] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-14] YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-13] KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-10] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-11] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-12] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-13] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-14] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-6] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-7] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-8] MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-9] NUPUR KUMAR[R-2]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
After Week/Month/Vacation
Ordinary
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-Aug-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 19-Jul-2023 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 12-Jul-2023 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 18-Jan-2023 | Ordinary |
| 09-Nov-2022 | Ordinary |
Orders
Case Summary: CA No. 7169/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging a 2008 High Court order that rejected a challenge to a 2002 Lab Attendant recruitment. The appellants challenged the selection six years after completion (2001) and appointment (2002), citing alleged illegalities discovered via newspaper reports and police inquiry. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal on grounds of delay and laches, noting respondents had worked continuously for over 20 years and no incriminatory evidence emerged from the police investigation. The Court declined to interfere with the selection process at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts