R.VENUGOPAL (D) THROUGH LRS. . vs VENKATARAMAN @ MURALI @ RAJA . — C.A. No. 1032/2014

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010093882008

Filing Date

01-Apr-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 1032/2014

Diary Number

9388/2008

Order Date

24-Jan-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.VENUGOPAL (D) THROUGH LRS. .

    Adv. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR PRAMOD DAYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VENKATARAMAN @ MURALI @ RAJA .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 08-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-Apr-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1032/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 001032/2014 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by R. Venugopal (through legal representatives) against Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that a Usufructory Gift Deed dated 25.4.1934 was validly executed before a Notary and had the force of a decree under French law applicable to Pondicherry at that time. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order remitting the matter back to the District Munsif's court for reopening, finding such remittal unnecessary. The appeal was allowed to this extent on 24 January 2014. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case