MADHURKAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs SADASHIVRAO . — C.A. No. 7860/2011

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010091352008

Filing Date

29-Mar-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 7860/2011

Diary Number

9135/2008

Order Date

17-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHURKAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

    Adv. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SADASHIVRAO .

    Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-2] [Gr] RANJITH K. C.[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  4. 16-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  6. 27-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 15-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 02-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 29-Mar-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7860/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 007860/2011 On 17-08-2017, the Supreme Court (Justices Arun Mishra and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar) heard Civil Appeal No. 7860/2011 filed by Madhurkar (through legal representatives) against Sadashivrao & another. After hearing counsel for both parties, the Court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned High Court order and dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case