DISHNET WIRELESS LTD. vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — C.A. No. 3041/2012

Case under Indirect Taxation : Entry Tax, Motor Vehicle Tax, Purchase Tax, Entertainment Tax, Terminal Tax, Octroi, Toll Tax, Professional Tax, Gold Control Act, Hotel Receipts Tax Act, Water and Sewage Tax, Luxury Tax, Cess Acts Section III-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010088522012

Filing Date

14-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 3041/2012

Diary Number

8852/2012

Order Date

10-Dec-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Entry tax, motor vehicle tax, purchase tax, entertainment tax, terminal tax, octroi, toll tax, professional tax, Gold Control Act, Hotel Receipts Tax Act, Water and sewage Tax, luxury tax, Cess Acts Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DISHNET WIRELESS LTD.

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Adv. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1] BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-2]

Case History

  1. 10-Dec-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 10-Dec-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  3. 22-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 22-Oct-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  5. 17-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  7. 17-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  10. 17-Sep-2015
  11. 17-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  12. 17-Sep-2015
  13. 21-Jul-2015
  14. 21-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  15. 21-Jul-2015
  16. 19-Jul-2012
  17. 17-Jul-2012
  18. 06-Jul-2012
  19. 26-Mar-2012
  20. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 14-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3041/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 003041/2012 (Dishnet Wireless Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh) On 10-12-2018, the Supreme Court heard an interlocutory application (IA 52051/2017) seeking discharge of advocate-on-record Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain from Civil Appeal No. 3041/2012. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar rejected the discharge application, finding that Mr. Jain had not retired from the case as required by law. The Court granted liberty to Mr. E.C. Agrawala to file a fresh discharge application following proper legal procedure and completing all required formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case