B.P.S.C. vs BALDEO CHOUDHARY — C.A. No. 3307/2015

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010088472013

Filing Date

14-Mar-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 3307/2015

Diary Number

8847/2013

Order Date

23-Oct-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B.P.S.C.

    Adv. NAVIN PRAKASH[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALDEO CHOUDHARY

    Adv. GOPAL SINGH[R-2] GOPAL SINGH[R-3] APARNA JHA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 29-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 14-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3307/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 003307/2015 — B.P.S.C. v. Baldeo Choudhary Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed B.P.S.C.'s appeal on October 23, 2019, upholding lower courts' decisions. The Court found that underlining in respondent Baldeo Choudhary's answer sheets occurred naturally during writing, not to gain undue advantage, and was rightly condoned. Key Direction: Respondent Choudhary, already employed in the Sales Tax Department, was declared qualified for appointment from November 29, 2012 (Division Bench judgment date). He shall receive notional service benefits, increments, and continuity of service. The State must finalize his appointment to a suitable position within three months and pay salary from his joining date. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case