B.P.S.C. vs BALDEO CHOUDHARY — C.A. No. 3307/2015
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010088472013
Filing Date
14-Mar-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 3307/2015
Diary Number
8847/2013
Order Date
23-Oct-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.P.S.C.
Adv. NAVIN PRAKASH[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALDEO CHOUDHARY
Adv. GOPAL SINGH[R-2] GOPAL SINGH[R-3] APARNA JHA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3307/2015
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003307/2015 — B.P.S.C. v. Baldeo Choudhary Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed B.P.S.C.'s appeal on October 23, 2019, upholding lower courts' decisions. The Court found that underlining in respondent Baldeo Choudhary's answer sheets occurred naturally during writing, not to gain undue advantage, and was rightly condoned. Key Direction: Respondent Choudhary, already employed in the Sales Tax Department, was declared qualified for appointment from November 29, 2012 (Division Bench judgment date). He shall receive notional service benefits, increments, and continuity of service. The State must finalize his appointment to a suitable position within three months and pay salary from his joining date. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts