M.J.THULSIRAMAN vs COMMR.. — C.A. No. 4676/2010
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010086552009
Filing Date
23-Mar-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 4676/2010
Diary Number
8655/2009
Order Date
03-Sep-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 990
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.J.THULSIRAMAN
Adv. R. N. KESWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMR..
Adv. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1] VINODH KANNA B.[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Sep-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
07-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4676/2010
-
[ 2019 INSC 990 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: M.J. Thulasiraman v. Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Administration Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal, upholding that the "Bakers Choultry" in Chennai constitutes a specific endowment under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, not private property. Key Reasoning: A rock inscription (dated 1834) in the choultry directing use of funds for feeding Brahmins during specific Hindu festivals constitutes a religious charity. The Court found the inscription satisfied the statutory definition of "specific endowment"—property dedicated for religious charity—as it establishes a public charity associated with Hindu festivals, involves divestment of income rights, and restricts the manager's power to alienate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts