THE STATE OF BIHAR vs KIRTI NARAYAN PRASAD — C.A. No. 8649/2018

Case under Section COMPUTER CELL. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010085722012

Filing Date

13-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 8649/2018

Diary Number

8572/2012

Order Date

30-Nov-2018

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2018 INSC 1123

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section COMPUTER CELL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Adv. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRTI NARAYAN PRASAD

    Adv. RAJIVKUMAR[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Nov-2018

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Nov-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  5. 01-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  6. 12-Jul-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  7. 03-Apr-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  8. 16-Jan-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  9. 14-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Jul-2016
  11. 11-Jul-2016
  12. 08-Apr-2016
  13. 27-Jan-2016
  14. 30-Nov-2015
  15. 08-Oct-2015
  16. 07-Sep-2015
  17. 07-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  18. 07-Sep-2015
  19. 24-Aug-2015
  20. 24-Aug-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  21. 24-Aug-2015
  22. 24-Jul-2015
  23. 24-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  24. 24-Jul-2015
  25. 20-Jul-2015
  26. 20-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 20-Jul-2015
  28. 15-May-2015
  29. 15-May-2015
  30. 13-Mar-2015
  31. 13-Mar-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  32. 13-Mar-2015
  33. 16-Feb-2015
  34. 16-Feb-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  35. 16-Feb-2015
  36. 09-Feb-2015
  37. 12-Jan-2015
  38. 12-Jan-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  39. 12-Jan-2015
  40. 08-Jan-2015
  41. 08-Jan-2015
  42. 15-Dec-2014
  43. 15-Dec-2014
  44. 05-Dec-2014
  45. 05-Dec-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  46. 05-Dec-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  47. 05-Dec-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  48. 05-Dec-2014
  49. 21-Nov-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  50. 01-Sep-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  51. 29-Aug-2014
  52. 29-Aug-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  53. 29-Aug-2014
  54. 28-Aug-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  55. 20-Jan-2014
  56. 13-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8649/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petitioners' appeals and allowed Bihar's appeals, holding that employees with illegal (void ab initio) government appointments cannot claim regularization. The Court found the petitioners were appointed without proper recruitment procedures—some with forged documents or by incompetent officials—and ruled that illegal appointments cannot be sanctified later, even after decades of service. Only irregular appointments of qualified persons in sanctioned posts qualify for regularization under the Umadevi doctrine; illegal appointments do not. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case