K.T. VEERAPPA . vs STATE OF KARNATAKA . — C.A. No. 1216 - 1256/2003

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010085692000

Filing Date

17-May-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 1216 - 1256/2003

Diary Number

8569/2000

Order Date

12-Apr-2006

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.T. VEERAPPA .

    Adv. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Apr-2006

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 26-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Aug-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 08-Jan-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-May-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1216 - 1256/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: K.T. Veerappa v. State of Karnataka Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and quashed the High Court's Division Bench judgment dated March 8, 2000. The Court restored the Single Judge's order directing the State of Karnataka and University of Mysore to extend revised pay scales effective January 1, 1977, and subsequent revisions to the appellants, with all monetary benefits payable within four months. Key Reasoning: The Court found the State and University's denial of pay scale benefits to similarly-placed employees arbitrary and discriminatory. Since 23 other University employees had already received these benefits under prior court orders, denying identical benefits to the appellants violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court rejected the respondents' argument that statutory amendments were prerequisites, holding that the earlier Division Bench order mandated immediate implementation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case