SHIV CHARAN DASS AND SONS THROUGH KARTA AJAY KHANNA vs RENU BALJEE . — SLP(C) No. 7565 - 7566/2016
Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010084742016
Filing Date
05-Mar-2016
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 7565 - 7566/2016
Diary Number
8474/2016
Order Date
20-Sep-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIV CHARAN DASS AND SONS THROUGH KARTA AJAY KHANNA
Adv. SHIRIN KHAJURIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.RENU BALJEE .
Adv. AMRENDRA KUMAR MEHTA SHIRIN KHAJURIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [Caveat]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
12-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2017
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
04-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
24-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
12-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 7565 - 7566/2016
Case Summary: In this landlord-tenant dispute, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Himachal Pradesh High Court's interim orders on use and occupation charges, which both parties opposed (landlords finding it meagre, tenants finding it excessive). Instead, the Court directed the High Court to dispose of the pending revision petition on its merits within nine months. The Court also allowed interlocutory applications for substitution by mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts