MAHARAJ SINGH vs STATE OF M.P. — Crl.A. No. 1045/2011

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010083832011

Filing Date

11-Mar-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1045/2011

Diary Number

8383/2011

Order Date

27-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARAJ SINGH

    Adv. PRATIBHA JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 16-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Apr-2011
  14. 11-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1045/2011

  15. 10-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 05-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 12-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Maharaj Singh v. State of M.P. (Crl.A. No. 1045/2011) On March 27, 2014, the Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Maharaj Singh and others (heard together with Crl.A. Nos. 2420-2421/2010). The appellants were convicted for the January 23, 1997 murder of Ramgopal, where they allegedly entered his house, dragged him out, and inflicted fatal injuries using swords and axes. The Court upheld the conviction under Sections 148, 302, 323, 335, 436, and 149 IPC, rejecting arguments that eyewitness testimony was unreliable and finding it sufficiently corroborated by postmortem evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case