ARULMIGHU NELLUKADAI MARIAMMAN TIRUKKOIL vs TAMILARASI (DEAD) BY LRS. — C.A. No. 4666/2019

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010081942012

Filing Date

12-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 4666/2019

Diary Number

8194/2012

Order Date

07-May-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 642

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARULMIGHU NELLUKADAI MARIAMMAN TIRUKKOIL

    Adv. R. CHANDRACHUD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAMILARASI (DEAD) BY LRS.

    Adv. B. SUNITA RAO[R-1.1] B. SUNITA RAO[R-1.2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-May-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 07-May-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  5. 22-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Apr-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  7. 10-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 10-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  9. 27-Apr-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Apr-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre

  11. 19-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  13. 05-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  15. 05-Dec-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Dec-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  17. 08-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 22-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 22-Feb-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 22-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 23-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 23-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 23-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 05-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 29-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 29-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 29-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 27-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 27-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 16-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 12-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4666/2019

  39. [ 2019 INSC 642 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Supreme Court allowed the eviction suit appeal and remanded the case to the High Court. The Court found the High Court violated mandatory procedural requirements under Section 100 of the CPC by framing substantial questions of law only in its final judgment rather than at the admission stage, thereby prejudicing the respondent's right to know the issues and respond appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case