K. NAMADEVAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs VENKATESAN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS — C.A. No. 8945/2013

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010077222007

Filing Date

14-Mar-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 8945/2013

Diary Number

7722/2007

Order Date

20-Aug-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. NAMADEVAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

    Adv. M. A. CHINNASAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VENKATESAN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS

    Adv. K. KRISHNA KUMAR SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Aug-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  4. 14-Aug-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  5. 08-Aug-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  6. 06-Aug-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  7. 09-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Jul-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  9. 11-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Apr-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  11. 27-Mar-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  12. 20-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Feb-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  14. 22-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 22-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 01-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 08-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 28-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 22-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 22-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 22-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 28-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 28-Apr-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 28-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 17-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 17-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 27-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 29-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 03-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 19-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 24-Jul-2009
  40. 16-Dec-2008
  41. 19-Nov-2008
  42. 15-Sep-2008
  43. 28-Jul-2008
  44. 15-May-2008
  45. 01-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 31-Mar-2008
  47. 04-Feb-2008
  48. 02-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 23-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 12-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 06-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 17-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 14-Mar-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8945/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 8945/2013 The Supreme Court dismissed K. Namadevan's appeal seeking property partition, upholding the High Court's limited relief of only 1/16 share based on a 1965 release deed. The Court found the appellant's claim through his father A. Kesavalu Maistry was constrained by an unchallenged 1978 settlement deed favoring K. Venkatesan, and the original suit was filed when partition relief was not yet appropriate. Companion appeal C.A. No. 8946/2013 was disposed of accordingly. No costs ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case