M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND . — Crl.A. No. 1421/2013

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010007712010

Filing Date

08-Jan-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1421/2013

Diary Number

771/2010

Order Date

10-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.

    Adv. PRAMOD DAYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND .

    Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 06-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 06-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 18-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1421/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. State of Uttarakhand (Crl.A. No. 1421/2013) The Supreme Court allowed Maruti Suzuki's appeal against a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust and cheating under IPC §406 and §420 regarding an unpaid Rs. 15,000 excise duty rebate. The Court directed Maruti Suzuki to deposit Rs. 30,000 within two weeks before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, enabling the complainant to withdraw it, and quashed the underlying criminal proceedings under Article 142 of the Constitution. The order clarified it shall not constitute precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case