HARYANA URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY . THRU ESTATE OFFICER vs CHANDER PAL — C.A. No. 4653/2009

Summary of C.A. No. 004653/2009 The Supreme Court allowed HUDA's appeal, setting aside the High Court's order that had permitted Chander Pal to deposit Rs. 3,50,000 to save his forfeited plot allotment. The Court found that Pal failed to deposit required amounts within stipulated timelines for over 12 years without justification, and his belated claim of financial hardship was insufficient to warrant policy relaxation. The Estate Officer's 2003 resumption and forfeiture order was upheld as proper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.