THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY vs MADAN — Crl.A. No. 71/2018
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010076852013
Filing Date
05-Mar-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 71/2018
Diary Number
7685/2013
Order Date
11-Jan-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. RAHUL KAUSHIK (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADAN
Adv. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
25-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 71/2018
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 2018 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the State of Uttarakhand's appeal on 11 January 2018, set aside the High Court's acquittal judgment, and remitted the case back to the High Court for fresh disposal. The Court found the High Court's cryptic order unacceptable as it failed to adequately address the evidence regarding whether the death was homicide or accident. Directions: The respondents (Madan & Anr.), who were originally convicted under Sections 302/34, 364, and 201 IPC but acquitted by the High Court, must be granted bail by the High Court upon application within four weeks. The High Court must dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 313 of 2004 with a reasoned order within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts