F.C.I vs SHYAMAL KUMAR BOSE . — C.A. No. 8132/2012

Case under Service Laws : Promotion, Seniority, Payment of Salary, Bonus, Provident Fund, Service Benefits, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Scales, Transfer Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010076762012

Filing Date

02-Mar-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 8132/2012

Diary Number

7676/2012

Order Date

10-Dec-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Laws : Promotion, seniority, payment of salary, bonus, provident fund, service benefits, equal pay for equal work, pay scales, transfer Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.F.C.I

    Adv. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO (Dead / Retired / Elevated) AJIT PUDUSSERY[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMAL KUMAR BOSE .

    Adv. SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-10] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-9] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-8] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-7] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-5] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] SARLA CHANDRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-6]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Dec-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  4. 04-Dec-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vipul M. Pancholi

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  12. 24-Jan-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jan-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar

  14. 23-Nov-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Nov-2023

    Administrative Order

    Registrar (Court & Building)

  16. 21-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Aug-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  18. 27-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Feb-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta

  20. 19-Jan-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 19-Jan-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J-VI)

  22. 25-Nov-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Nov-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J-VI)

  24. 30-Sep-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 30-Sep-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  26. 18-Aug-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 18-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 26-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 26-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 26-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 23-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 02-Mar-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8132/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 008132/2012 - Food Corporation of India v. Shyamal Kumar Bose Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed FCI's appeal on December 10, 2025, setting aside the High Court Division Bench's order and restoring the Single Judge's dismissal. The Court rejected respondents' claim for higher pay scales granted to other employees. Key Holdings: The Court found the writ petition was filed 15 years after similar relief was granted to other employees, constituting unreasonable delay and laches warranting dismissal. Additionally, respondents (Assistant Grade-III) could not claim pay parity with employees (Assistant Grade-II) performing higher-ranked duties, as they never performed those higher post duties themselves. Next Steps: All pending applications stand disposed of; the case is concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case