CHANDRAMANI vs DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE NO. 6 OF BAR COUNCIL OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND SIKKIM — W.P.(C) No. 288/2026

Case under Bar Council, Bar Associations, Advocates, Other Professional Bodies : Enrolment, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Action Against Advocates, Elections to Bar Councils/bar Associations, Advocate Strike Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010073202026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 288/2026

Diary Number

7320/2026

Order Date

01-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bar Council, Bar Associations, Advocates, other professional bodies : Enrolment, professional misconduct, disciplinary action against Advocates, elections to Bar Councils/Bar Associations, Advocate strike Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAMANI

    Adv. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE NO. 6 OF BAR COUNCIL OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND SIKKIM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 288/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 01-04-2026, the Supreme Court (Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta) heard Writ Petition No. 288/2026 filed by Chandramani against the Disciplinary Committee No. 6 of Bar Council of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim. The Court allowed the petitioner's interim application to appear and argue in person but dismissed the main writ petition, holding it was not inclined to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. All pending applications stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case