HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEV. BANK vs NEELAM — C.A. No. 1672/2002
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010071942000
Filing Date
26-Apr-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 1672/2002
Diary Number
7194/2000
Order Date
28-Feb-2005
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEV. BANK
Respondent(s)
-
1.NEELAM
Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Feb-2005
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1672/2002
-
01-Jan-1970
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's decision, holding that the Labour Court did not err in denying relief to Neelam. The Court ruled that while no prescribed limitation period exists for industrial disputes, courts retain discretion to deny relief for stale claims based on facts and circumstances, particularly where the worker accepted alternative employment, delayed raising the dispute beyond a reasonable time, and third-party rights had been created. The Court also rejected the res judicata objection to the Labour Court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts