MUSLEMIN MAHAMMAD vs STATE OF ODISHA — C.A. No. 3904/2026

Case under Service Laws : Promotion, Seniority, Payment of Salary, Bonus, Provident Fund, Service Benefits, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Scales, Transfer Section XI-A. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010069432026

DISPOSED

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

C.A. No. 3904/2026

Diary Number

6943/2026

Order Date

25-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Data as of 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Laws : Promotion, seniority, payment of salary, bonus, provident fund, service benefits, equal pay for equal work, pay scales, transfer Section XI-A

Petitioner(s)

MUSLEMIN MAHAMMAD

Adv. SUBHASISH MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

25-Mar-2026

Fixed Date by Court

24-Mar-2026

Fixed Date by Court

18-Mar-2026

Fixed Date by Court

13-Mar-2026

Fixed Date by Court

23-Feb-2026

FRESH

Orders in this case

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: MA

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Supreme Court Hearing Summary This document contains hearing records from the Supreme Court of India. The most significant case is Muslemin Mahammad & Ors. v. State of Odisha, which involves approximately 132 education-related matters regarding Grant-in-Aid (GIA) benefits under the 1994 scheme. Key Outcome (March 25, 2026): The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the State of Odisha while disposing of appeals filed by private persons (employees and institutions) as follows: 1. State's appeals dismissed - No interference with High Court's order dated March 19, 2025 2. Private persons' appeals disposed of - To be handled per the High Court's directions 3. Verification required - State authorities directed to verify whether employees/institutions received prior recommendations before the GIA Order 1994 repeal (February 5, 2004) 4. Deadline: State to complete verification and pass appropriate orders within 6 months from the order date High Court's Reasoning: The High Court held that the landmark judgment *State of Odisha v. Anup Kumar Senapati* (2019) does not create an absolute bar on GIA benefits where: - Eligible employees/institutions received recommendations before GIA Order 1994 repeal - Similar claims were previously allowed by courts without interference by the apex court - Earlier review and curative petitions challenging GIA benefits were rejected Next Steps: - The matter is now remanded to State authorities for verification and appropriate orders - Multiple related SLPs were either disposed of, dismissed as withdrawn, or listed for subsequent hearings This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case