PRABHA SHARMA vs BALRAM PATEL — Crl.A. No. 1841 - 1842/2011

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010069262011

Filing Date

01-Mar-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1841 - 1842/2011

Diary Number

6926/2011

Order Date

17-Aug-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHA SHARMA

    Adv. NAMITA CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALRAM PATEL

    Adv. VIKAS SINGH JANGRA VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[R-3] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-2] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Aug-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala

  4. 13-Apr-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  6. 08-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 14-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Jul-2012
  16. 08-Feb-2012
  17. 16-Sep-2011
  18. 14-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 18-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 11-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 01-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1841 - 1842/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prabha Sharma v. Balram Patel Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals and special leave petitions on August 17, 2023. The Court upheld the High Court's judgment finding that Accused No. 2 (Gudda @ Vijay Patel) lacked common intention under Section 34 IPC despite his presence at the crime scene, and thus could not be convicted under Section 302 IPC. Respondent Balram Patel's death was noted during proceedings, making those portions moot. Next Steps: All pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of. The matter is concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case