MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEV.AUTH. vs MAHADEO GAMBHIRA INGOLE . — C.A. No. 8137/2009
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010006712007
Filing Date
04-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 8137/2009
Diary Number
671/2007
Order Date
07-Dec-2009
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEV.AUTH.
Adv. CHIRAG M. SHROFF
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHADEO GAMBHIRA INGOLE .
Adv. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU ASHA GOPALAN NAIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8137/2009
On 7 December 2009, the Supreme Court allowed Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority's appeal against the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) order dated 9 October 2006. The Court found the Division Bench had failed to provide proper reasons for affirming the Single Judge's order, holding that even affirmance orders must contain reasoned justification. The matter was remanded to the High Court's Division Bench to decide afresh expeditiously after hearing parties and providing proper reasons, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts