STATE OF TRIPURA . vs CHANDANA ROY . — SLP(C) No. 9292 - 9293/2008
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010066622008
Filing Date
05-Mar-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 9292 - 9293/2008
Diary Number
6662/2008
Order Date
04-Aug-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF TRIPURA .
Adv. GOPAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANDANA ROY .
Adv. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9292 - 9293/2008
Case Summary: State of Tripura v. Chandana Roy On 04/08/2011, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) Nos. 9292-9293/2008 (appeals from High Court of Gauhati judgment dated 25/07/2007). Justice Dalveer Bhandari granted petitioners' counsel a final two-week extension to furnish the latest and complete address of respondent No.1 to enable issuance of a demand draft. The case remained pending further compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts